https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293306 The court ruled that the suit was not maintainable due to the lack of notice as required by Section 424 of the Civil Procedure Code. It emphasized the universal application of notice provisions in suits against the Secretary of State for India in Council, stating that the absence of notice rendered the suit not maintainable regardless of the relief sought. The court rejected arguments for exceptions to the notice requirement, highlighting the legislative intent to provide the government time for reflection in all types of suits against the Secretary of State. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 1912 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:45:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293306 The court ruled that the suit was not maintainable due to the lack of notice as required by Section 424 of the Civil Procedure Code. It emphasized the universal application of notice provisions in suits against the Secretary of State for India in Council, stating that the absence of notice rendered the suit not maintainable regardless of the relief sought. The court rejected arguments for exceptions to the notice requirement, highlighting the legislative intent to provide the government time for reflection in all types of suits against the Secretary of State. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jul 1912 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293306