<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 111 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24546</link>
    <description>The Madhya Pradesh HC followed its earlier ruling on similar facts and held that the entire income from the former Ruler of Bastar&#039;s palace remained exempt from income-tax. The Court found no reason to depart from the prior decision, under which the Tribunal was justified in treating the palace income as fully exempt. The reference was answered in favour of exemption and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:07:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 111 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24546</link>
      <description>The Madhya Pradesh HC followed its earlier ruling on similar facts and held that the entire income from the former Ruler of Bastar&#039;s palace remained exempt from income-tax. The Court found no reason to depart from the prior decision, under which the Tribunal was justified in treating the palace income as fully exempt. The reference was answered in favour of exemption and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>