https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403652 The Court directed the Petitioners to pursue the statutory remedy under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 instead of seeking relief through writ court. The Petitioners were instructed to file objections before the Deputy Commissioner, Anti-Evasion, CGST East, with necessary documents. The Court emphasized that it had not assessed the case's merits and granted both parties the liberty to pursue their contentions and remedies as per the law. The authority was ordered to handle objections impartially and dispose of them within two weeks, allowing the Petitioners to seek further legal remedies if needed. en-us Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:50:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403652 The Court directed the Petitioners to pursue the statutory remedy under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 instead of seeking relief through writ court. The Petitioners were instructed to file objections before the Deputy Commissioner, Anti-Evasion, CGST East, with necessary documents. The Court emphasized that it had not assessed the case's merits and granted both parties the liberty to pursue their contentions and remedies as per the law. The authority was ordered to handle objections impartially and dispose of them within two weeks, allowing the Petitioners to seek further legal remedies if needed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403652