https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403651 The court disposed of the writ application by directing Respondent No.3 to review the representation for document copies and make a lawful decision within a week. Emphasizing the importance of returning documents not relied upon in legal proceedings, the court highlighted adherence to guidelines. If documents cannot be returned, valid reasons must be provided to the writ applicants. The judgment stresses procedural fairness in document seizure cases and underscores the need for timely and lawful decision-making by authorities. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 May 2021 13:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403651 The court disposed of the writ application by directing Respondent No.3 to review the representation for document copies and make a lawful decision within a week. Emphasizing the importance of returning documents not relied upon in legal proceedings, the court highlighted adherence to guidelines. If documents cannot be returned, valid reasons must be provided to the writ applicants. The judgment stresses procedural fairness in document seizure cases and underscores the need for timely and lawful decision-making by authorities. Case-Laws GST Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403651