<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 136 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403644</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay modified the order directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the liability amount as pre-deposit to 10%. The court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue its appeal before the appellate authority. The judgment highlighted the importance of affording parties sufficient opportunity and the discretion of the appellate authority in determining pre-deposit amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 136 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403644</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay modified the order directing the petitioner to deposit 20% of the liability amount as pre-deposit to 10%. The court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue its appeal before the appellate authority. The judgment highlighted the importance of affording parties sufficient opportunity and the discretion of the appellate authority in determining pre-deposit amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>