<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403642</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal in favor of the Assessee, ruling on the interpretation of Section 194A(3) and related provisions for tax deduction at source by cooperative societies. The Court clarified that the subsequent amendment did not apply to the relevant Assessment Year, allowing cooperative banks like the Assessee to benefit from the exemption. Additionally, the Court held that the principle of res judicata did not apply to this case, emphasizing consistency in decisions for the specific Assessment Year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:32:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403642</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal in favor of the Assessee, ruling on the interpretation of Section 194A(3) and related provisions for tax deduction at source by cooperative societies. The Court clarified that the subsequent amendment did not apply to the relevant Assessment Year, allowing cooperative banks like the Assessee to benefit from the exemption. Additionally, the Court held that the principle of res judicata did not apply to this case, emphasizing consistency in decisions for the specific Assessment Year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>