<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Security Interest Holder Not a Financial Creditor u/s 5(7) and (8) Despite Collateral Security in Corporate Debtor&#039;s Shares.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56574</link>
    <description>Financial Creditors or not - a person having only security interest over the assets of corporate debtor, even if falling within the description of &#039;secured creditor&#039; by virtue of collateral security extended by the corporate debtor, would not be covered by the financial creditors as per definitions contained in sub-section (7) and (8) of Section 5. What has been held by this Court as noted above is fully attracted in the present case where corporate debtor has only extended a security by pledging 40,160 shares of GEL. The appellant at best will be secured debtor qua above security but shall not be a financial creditor within the meaning of Section 5 sub-sections (7) and (8). - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 08:36:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 08:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Security Interest Holder Not a Financial Creditor u/s 5(7) and (8) Despite Collateral Security in Corporate Debtor&#039;s Shares.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56574</link>
      <description>Financial Creditors or not - a person having only security interest over the assets of corporate debtor, even if falling within the description of &#039;secured creditor&#039; by virtue of collateral security extended by the corporate debtor, would not be covered by the financial creditors as per definitions contained in sub-section (7) and (8) of Section 5. What has been held by this Court as noted above is fully attracted in the present case where corporate debtor has only extended a security by pledging 40,160 shares of GEL. The appellant at best will be secured debtor qua above security but shall not be a financial creditor within the meaning of Section 5 sub-sections (7) and (8). - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 08:36:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>