<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403625</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed the communication and directed the respondents to defreeze specified accounts for the appellant to make statutory payments. Emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under the PMLA, the Court clarified actions under special laws must follow specific procedures. The appeal succeeded in defreezing accounts, with no cost order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403625</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed the communication and directed the respondents to defreeze specified accounts for the appellant to make statutory payments. Emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under the PMLA, the Court clarified actions under special laws must follow specific procedures. The appeal succeeded in defreezing accounts, with no cost order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>