<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 111 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403619</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the CESTAT&#039;s order, which had set aside and remanded a matter for jurisdictional adjudication based on a stayed judgment by the SC. The High Court directed the Tribunal to await the SC&#039;s decision before proceeding further. The appeal&#039;s focus on the amendment to Section 28 was not addressed in detail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 111 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403619</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the CESTAT&#039;s order, which had set aside and remanded a matter for jurisdictional adjudication based on a stayed judgment by the SC. The High Court directed the Tribunal to await the SC&#039;s decision before proceeding further. The appeal&#039;s focus on the amendment to Section 28 was not addressed in detail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>