<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 95 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403603</link>
    <description>No taxable permanent establishment was established on the facts because the foreign enterprise did not have a fixed place of business at its disposal in India under Article 5(1) or Article 5(2). Even on the Revenue&#039;s alternative case of a dependent agent permanent establishment under Article 5(4), Article 7 permitted attribution only of profits actually attributable to that PE, and no further income could be attributed where the Indian agent had already been remunerated at arm&#039;s length for the functions performed and risks assumed. A remand to re-examine the agent&#039;s remuneration was declined because the record showed no specific deficiency in the existing compensation. The arrangement was therefore tax-neutral and no additional income was taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 95 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403603</link>
      <description>No taxable permanent establishment was established on the facts because the foreign enterprise did not have a fixed place of business at its disposal in India under Article 5(1) or Article 5(2). Even on the Revenue&#039;s alternative case of a dependent agent permanent establishment under Article 5(4), Article 7 permitted attribution only of profits actually attributable to that PE, and no further income could be attributed where the Indian agent had already been remunerated at arm&#039;s length for the functions performed and risks assumed. A remand to re-examine the agent&#039;s remuneration was declined because the record showed no specific deficiency in the existing compensation. The arrangement was therefore tax-neutral and no additional income was taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>