<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 80 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403588</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to grant the deduction under Section 80IB(10) as the actual land area met the requirement, including the area earmarked for road widening. The Tribunal criticized the AO for unfounded encroachment allegations and emphasized the importance of accurate land measurements and considering public infrastructure areas for tax deduction eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 80 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403588</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to grant the deduction under Section 80IB(10) as the actual land area met the requirement, including the area earmarked for road widening. The Tribunal criticized the AO for unfounded encroachment allegations and emphasized the importance of accurate land measurements and considering public infrastructure areas for tax deduction eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>