<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1428 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, citing the availability of alternative remedies and the impact of a RERA order directing reimbursement. The Tribunal acknowledged the debt but directed the Petitioner to approach the Insolvency Resolution Professional appointed in another petition against the same Debtor, emphasizing that multiple petitions against the same Debtor were impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1428 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor, citing the availability of alternative remedies and the impact of a RERA order directing reimbursement. The Tribunal acknowledged the debt but directed the Petitioner to approach the Insolvency Resolution Professional appointed in another petition against the same Debtor, emphasizing that multiple petitions against the same Debtor were impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>