https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293286 Section 11 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act bars civil suits only against the Government for acts or omissions of a Revenue Officer where statutory remedies against the State have not been exhausted; it does not exclude a suit between private parties claiming rival title to property. Civil court jurisdiction remains preserved under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure unless expressly or impliedly barred, and no such bar arose here. Mutation entries are only fiscal records and do not create or extinguish title. Protection under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act supports restraint on alienation pending adjudication. The suit was therefore maintainable and the injunction was upheld. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:14:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293286 Section 11 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act bars civil suits only against the Government for acts or omissions of a Revenue Officer where statutory remedies against the State have not been exhausted; it does not exclude a suit between private parties claiming rival title to property. Civil court jurisdiction remains preserved under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure unless expressly or impliedly barred, and no such bar arose here. Mutation entries are only fiscal records and do not create or extinguish title. Protection under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act supports restraint on alienation pending adjudication. The suit was therefore maintainable and the injunction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293286