https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293283 Forfeiture of a lease under Section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act arises only where the lessee, while the lease subsists, clearly and unequivocally renounces the tenancy by asserting title in himself or a third party, or by disclaiming the lessor's title with knowledge brought home to the lessor. An incidental claim of ownership, an adverse possession plea, or a bare denial of landlord-tenant relationship is not enough. On the facts, the alleged sale was not proved as a basis for forfeiture, and the materials did not establish the kind of clear disclaimer needed. The ejectment claim therefore failed. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293283 Forfeiture of a lease under Section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act arises only where the lessee, while the lease subsists, clearly and unequivocally renounces the tenancy by asserting title in himself or a third party, or by disclaiming the lessor's title with knowledge brought home to the lessor. An incidental claim of ownership, an adverse possession plea, or a bare denial of landlord-tenant relationship is not enough. On the facts, the alleged sale was not proved as a basis for forfeiture, and the materials did not establish the kind of clear disclaimer needed. The ejectment claim therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293283