<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 74 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld its decision to allow the assessee to claim weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on Form No.3CL, despite the revenue&#039;s arguments citing a decision by the Karnataka High Court and a distinction with a previous case. The Tribunal emphasized the legal interpretation from a relevant case and clarified the significance of Form No.3CL for claiming deductions during the assessment year. Additionally, the Tribunal corrected a typographical error in the order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s miscellaneous application, stating that rectification of mistakes is permissible but not a review of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 74 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld its decision to allow the assessee to claim weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, based on Form No.3CL, despite the revenue&#039;s arguments citing a decision by the Karnataka High Court and a distinction with a previous case. The Tribunal emphasized the legal interpretation from a relevant case and clarified the significance of Form No.3CL for claiming deductions during the assessment year. Additionally, the Tribunal corrected a typographical error in the order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s miscellaneous application, stating that rectification of mistakes is permissible but not a review of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>