<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 61 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403569</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete additions related to franking charges, processing charges, and trade payables under section 41(1). The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence and justification before disallowing expenses, noting that trade liabilities were valid and payable by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 61 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403569</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete additions related to franking charges, processing charges, and trade payables under section 41(1). The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence and justification before disallowing expenses, noting that trade liabilities were valid and payable by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>