https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403560 An application to alter an order fixing the resolution professional's fees and expenses was held not maintainable because the original order had been passed with consent of both sides. The Tribunal found that no objection was raised when the order was dictated, and the later challenge to the proxy counsel's authority was an afterthought. It also held that the request did not amount to correction of a clerical or arithmetical error, nor did it disclose a mistake apparent on the face of the record. The application seeking interference with the consent order was therefore rejected. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:42:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403560 An application to alter an order fixing the resolution professional's fees and expenses was held not maintainable because the original order had been passed with consent of both sides. The Tribunal found that no objection was raised when the order was dictated, and the later challenge to the proxy counsel's authority was an afterthought. It also held that the request did not amount to correction of a clerical or arithmetical error, nor did it disclose a mistake apparent on the face of the record. The application seeking interference with the consent order was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403560