<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403556</link>
    <description>A single purchase transaction can fall within the expression &quot;casual trader&quot; where the statute contemplates occasional business-like dealings in goods. Reading the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 and the entry tax machinery provisions harmoniously, the Court applied the rule that singular words may include the plural unless the context requires otherwise. It rejected a construction that would exclude a person with only one such transaction from the special limitation scheme, as that would defeat the legislative purpose of treating casual transactions differently. The assessment was therefore governed by the shortened period applicable to casual traders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 48 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403556</link>
      <description>A single purchase transaction can fall within the expression &quot;casual trader&quot; where the statute contemplates occasional business-like dealings in goods. Reading the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 and the entry tax machinery provisions harmoniously, the Court applied the rule that singular words may include the plural unless the context requires otherwise. It rejected a construction that would exclude a person with only one such transaction from the special limitation scheme, as that would defeat the legislative purpose of treating casual transactions differently. The assessment was therefore governed by the shortened period applicable to casual traders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>