https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293277 A corrupt practice under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was stated not to create criminal liability against a third party unless the facts independently satisfied a penal provision; Section 125 also required allegations of promotion of enmity or hatred on the specified grounds, which were absent. The complaint was further found not to disclose undue influence or personation under Section 171F IPC. Separately, a Magistrate could not reject a B-report or take cognisance without notice to the complainant, and process against a person outside territorial jurisdiction required compliance with Section 202 CrPC. Electronic material could be looked at at the cognisance stage even without a Section 65B certificate. en-us Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:02:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293277 A corrupt practice under Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 was stated not to create criminal liability against a third party unless the facts independently satisfied a penal provision; Section 125 also required allegations of promotion of enmity or hatred on the specified grounds, which were absent. The complaint was further found not to disclose undue influence or personation under Section 171F IPC. Separately, a Magistrate could not reject a B-report or take cognisance without notice to the complainant, and process against a person outside territorial jurisdiction required compliance with Section 202 CrPC. Electronic material could be looked at at the cognisance stage even without a Section 65B certificate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293277