<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1395 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293252</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the original assessment order was reasoned and based on thorough inquiries, dismissing the allegations of erroneous assessment and lack of adequate hearing. It emphasized that the revisionary power under section 263 is triggered only when there is a lack of proper inquiry or investigation, which was not the case here.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:02:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1395 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293252</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the original assessment order was reasoned and based on thorough inquiries, dismissing the allegations of erroneous assessment and lack of adequate hearing. It emphasized that the revisionary power under section 263 is triggered only when there is a lack of proper inquiry or investigation, which was not the case here.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>