https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293264 Property connected with a textile undertaking was held to vest with the Central Government, and then with the appellant, because the statutory expression covering the owner's right, title and interest was construed broadly. An unregistered agreement to sell and reliance on Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act did not establish ownership or authorised occupation against that statutory vesting. The existence of a title dispute did not displace the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act in these facts, and the High Court erred in treating the respondent as outside the definition of unauthorised occupant. Proceedings under the Public Premises Act were therefore maintainable. en-us Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293264 Property connected with a textile undertaking was held to vest with the Central Government, and then with the appellant, because the statutory expression covering the owner's right, title and interest was construed broadly. An unregistered agreement to sell and reliance on Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act did not establish ownership or authorised occupation against that statutory vesting. The existence of a title dispute did not displace the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act in these facts, and the High Court erred in treating the respondent as outside the definition of unauthorised occupant. Proceedings under the Public Premises Act were therefore maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293264