<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1696 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293240</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for VSAT and lease line expenses, citing correct TDS deduction under section 194J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on disallowance of bad debts under section 36(2) was dismissed due to lack of new legal or factual basis, affirming the lower appellate order in favor of the assessee. The judgment was delivered on 4th September 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:00:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=635192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1696 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293240</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for VSAT and lease line expenses, citing correct TDS deduction under section 194J. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on disallowance of bad debts under section 36(2) was dismissed due to lack of new legal or factual basis, affirming the lower appellate order in favor of the assessee. The judgment was delivered on 4th September 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>