<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24514</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, a firm of solicitors and advocates, in a case concerning the treatment of clients&#039; deposits and expenses for the assessment year 1985-86. The court upheld the petitioners&#039; longstanding accounting method, emphasizing compliance with professional standards and rejecting the tax authorities&#039; attempt to impose a different method. The respondents were restrained from taking further steps based on the challenged directions, and they were directed to pay the costs of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:40:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 8 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24514</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, a firm of solicitors and advocates, in a case concerning the treatment of clients&#039; deposits and expenses for the assessment year 1985-86. The court upheld the petitioners&#039; longstanding accounting method, emphasizing compliance with professional standards and rejecting the tax authorities&#039; attempt to impose a different method. The respondents were restrained from taking further steps based on the challenged directions, and they were directed to pay the costs of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>