https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24512 The High Court treated as questions of law the interrelation between a subsisting assessment under section 143(3) and an order recognising complete partition on change of status from individual to Hindu undivided family, and also the Commissioner's revisional jurisdiction to set aside the partition-recognition order after enquiry. It did not decide either issue on the merits. Instead, it allowed the application under section 256(2) and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer both questions to the High Court for opinion. en-us Thu, 22 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:10:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24512 The High Court treated as questions of law the interrelation between a subsisting assessment under section 143(3) and an order recognising complete partition on change of status from individual to Hindu undivided family, and also the Commissioner's revisional jurisdiction to set aside the partition-recognition order after enquiry. It did not decide either issue on the merits. Instead, it allowed the application under section 256(2) and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer both questions to the High Court for opinion. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 22 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24512