<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 104 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24501</link>
    <description>The question whether valuation of a residential property had to be computed under Rule 1BB of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 was treated as a question of law fit for reference. The High Court accepted that the valuation controversy required judicial determination and directed the Appellate Tribunal to refer the stated question for its opinion. The application was therefore allowed, with the Tribunal required to place the question before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 104 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24501</link>
      <description>The question whether valuation of a residential property had to be computed under Rule 1BB of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 was treated as a question of law fit for reference. The High Court accepted that the valuation controversy required judicial determination and directed the Appellate Tribunal to refer the stated question for its opinion. The application was therefore allowed, with the Tribunal required to place the question before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>