<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 10 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24494</link>
    <description>The court held that female members of a Hindu undivided family do not have the authority to enter into agreements regarding family income, as they only have rights to maintenance, not ownership or management. In cases with only one male member, that individual has absolute management rights. The court ruled that any agreements by female members on family income are unauthorized. Additionally, the court denied the allowance of a salary to the karta for managing the family business, stating that without other male members, the karta cannot receive remuneration as their duties are obligatory under Hindu Law. The decision favored the Revenue in all aspects against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 10 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24494</link>
      <description>The court held that female members of a Hindu undivided family do not have the authority to enter into agreements regarding family income, as they only have rights to maintenance, not ownership or management. In cases with only one male member, that individual has absolute management rights. The court ruled that any agreements by female members on family income are unauthorized. Additionally, the court denied the allowance of a salary to the karta for managing the family business, stating that without other male members, the karta cannot receive remuneration as their duties are obligatory under Hindu Law. The decision favored the Revenue in all aspects against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>