<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>India’s response to S 301 Report of U.S. on Equalisation Levy</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=23524</link>
    <description>India&#039;s Equalisation Levy applies to non resident e commerce operators without a permanent establishment who earn revenue from the Indian market; it is intended to level the tax treatment between resident and non resident suppliers, is prospective and territorially confined to India, and was defended to the USTR as non discriminatory and consistent with OECD BEPS work, though the USTR subsequently found it discriminatory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 09:53:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 09:53:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>India’s response to S 301 Report of U.S. on Equalisation Levy</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=23524</link>
      <description>India&#039;s Equalisation Levy applies to non resident e commerce operators without a permanent establishment who earn revenue from the Indian market; it is intended to level the tax treatment between resident and non resident suppliers, is prospective and territorially confined to India, and was defended to the USTR as non discriminatory and consistent with OECD BEPS work, though the USTR subsequently found it discriminatory.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 09:53:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=23524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>