<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 6 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24484</link>
    <description>Payment for purchase of loom hours was treated as revenue expenditure, applying Supreme Court principles on the revenue capital distinction, and was therefore deductible in computing business income in favour of the assessee. Questions on the validity of reassessment were not decided and were left unanswered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:03:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 6 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24484</link>
      <description>Payment for purchase of loom hours was treated as revenue expenditure, applying Supreme Court principles on the revenue capital distinction, and was therefore deductible in computing business income in favour of the assessee. Questions on the validity of reassessment were not decided and were left unanswered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>