<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24478</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the inclusion of an ex gratia payment in the total income under section 17(3)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1970-71. The court held that the ex gratia payment was voluntary and not compensation, thus not taxable as income. Consequently, the court answered the question in the affirmative against the Revenue, with no order as to costs. Judge K. M. Yusuf concurred with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:45:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24478</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the inclusion of an ex gratia payment in the total income under section 17(3)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1970-71. The court held that the ex gratia payment was voluntary and not compensation, thus not taxable as income. Consequently, the court answered the question in the affirmative against the Revenue, with no order as to costs. Judge K. M. Yusuf concurred with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>