<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 96 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24442</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court held that the dividend reserve related to preference shares should be included in the capital computation base for taxation purposes, aligning with the Supreme Court precedent in Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1981] 132 ITR 559. The ruling favored the Revenue, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:08:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 96 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24442</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court held that the dividend reserve related to preference shares should be included in the capital computation base for taxation purposes, aligning with the Supreme Court precedent in Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1981] 132 ITR 559. The ruling favored the Revenue, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>