<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Bail; Challenge to Sections 132 and 69 Not Sufficient; No Interrogation Argument Rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56537</link>
    <description>Grant of Bail - petitioner is in custody since 5th December, 2020 and that no interrogation is done - The bail cannot be granted solely on the ground that vires of Section 132 and 69 of the Act are under challenge - The factual error pointed out in impugned order cannot in itself be a reason for allowing the prayer. The Court below had given other reasons also for denying the bail. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 07:31:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 07:31:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Bail; Challenge to Sections 132 and 69 Not Sufficient; No Interrogation Argument Rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56537</link>
      <description>Grant of Bail - petitioner is in custody since 5th December, 2020 and that no interrogation is done - The bail cannot be granted solely on the ground that vires of Section 132 and 69 of the Act are under challenge - The factual error pointed out in impugned order cannot in itself be a reason for allowing the prayer. The Court below had given other reasons also for denying the bail. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 07:31:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>