<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 5 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403513</link>
    <description>The service rendered by Tata Sons Ltd. under the BEBP agreement was deemed eligible as an &quot;input service&quot; for Tata Steel Ltd. The service tax paid was available as Cenvat credit to Tata Steel Ltd. The distribution of the credit of service tax paid under the BEBP Agreement exclusively to Tata Steel Ltd.&#039;s Jamshedpur Steelworks was valid. The tax demanded and penalties imposed were unsustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 06:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 5 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403513</link>
      <description>The service rendered by Tata Sons Ltd. under the BEBP agreement was deemed eligible as an &quot;input service&quot; for Tata Steel Ltd. The service tax paid was available as Cenvat credit to Tata Steel Ltd. The distribution of the credit of service tax paid under the BEBP Agreement exclusively to Tata Steel Ltd.&#039;s Jamshedpur Steelworks was valid. The tax demanded and penalties imposed were unsustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>