<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 2 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalties imposed under section 18(1)(c) for all the assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the authority to exercise discretion in penalty imposition based on the circumstances of each case, highlighting that the deeming fiction of concealment should not override bonafide explanations and compliance with tax obligations upon notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 2 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalties imposed under section 18(1)(c) for all the assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the authority to exercise discretion in penalty imposition based on the circumstances of each case, highlighting that the deeming fiction of concealment should not override bonafide explanations and compliance with tax obligations upon notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>