https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293215 The court interpreted the scope of Section 23(3) of the Representation of People Act, 1950, emphasizing the prohibition on amending electoral rolls post-nomination. It held that such amendments are impermissible to maintain the integrity of the electoral process. The inclusion of new electors after the nomination date renders their votes void, potentially leading to the election's voidance if materially affecting results. Upholding legal principles, the court dismissed the appeal, underscoring the importance of adhering to statutory provisions for fair and transparent elections. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:52:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293215 The court interpreted the scope of Section 23(3) of the Representation of People Act, 1950, emphasizing the prohibition on amending electoral rolls post-nomination. It held that such amendments are impermissible to maintain the integrity of the electoral process. The inclusion of new electors after the nomination date renders their votes void, potentially leading to the election's voidance if materially affecting results. Upholding legal principles, the court dismissed the appeal, underscoring the importance of adhering to statutory provisions for fair and transparent elections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293215