https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293214 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside previous judgments and remanding the case to the Small Causes Court in Calcutta for further proceedings. The court held that the tenant must pay a proportionate part of the rent based on the circumstances of the case, emphasizing that the doctrine of suspension of rent should not be applied inflexibly. The court criticized the High Court's rejection of the plea for apportionment of rent as too technical and highlighted the inequity of allowing the landlord to recover full rent without providing full possession of the premises. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:52:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293214 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside previous judgments and remanding the case to the Small Causes Court in Calcutta for further proceedings. The court held that the tenant must pay a proportionate part of the rent based on the circumstances of the case, emphasizing that the doctrine of suspension of rent should not be applied inflexibly. The court criticized the High Court's rejection of the plea for apportionment of rent as too technical and highlighted the inequity of allowing the landlord to recover full rent without providing full possession of the premises. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293214