https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293214 A tenant deprived of possession of only part of the leased premises is not automatically entitled to suspend rent altogether; the proper relief depends on the facts, including how much of the premises remains enjoyed. Where partial possession has been delivered, rent relief may instead take the form of apportionment, with the payable amount determined according to the portion actually occupied. The Court rejected a rigid rule of total rent suspension and treated the matter as requiring evidence on proportionate rent. The matter was remitted for fresh determination of the rent attributable to the part of the premises retained by the tenant. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:52:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293214 A tenant deprived of possession of only part of the leased premises is not automatically entitled to suspend rent altogether; the proper relief depends on the facts, including how much of the premises remains enjoyed. Where partial possession has been delivered, rent relief may instead take the form of apportionment, with the payable amount determined according to the portion actually occupied. The Court rejected a rigid rule of total rent suspension and treated the matter as requiring evidence on proportionate rent. The matter was remitted for fresh determination of the rent attributable to the part of the premises retained by the tenant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293214