<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1091 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403499</link>
    <description>The petition challenging an order confirming a tax and penalty demand was allowed. The Court found errors in the appeal authority&#039;s actions, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and evidence-based decision-making. The order was set aside due to lack of findings on tax evasion or document reuse, with any deposited amount to be returned to the petitioner. Remanding the case was deemed unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1091 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403499</link>
      <description>The petition challenging an order confirming a tax and penalty demand was allowed. The Court found errors in the appeal authority&#039;s actions, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and evidence-based decision-making. The order was set aside due to lack of findings on tax evasion or document reuse, with any deposited amount to be returned to the petitioner. Remanding the case was deemed unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>