<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Denies Direct Refund Claim; Petitioner Must Use Statutory Remedy Under Income Tax Act Section 244A.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56501</link>
    <description>Refunds claim along with interest accrued thereon u/s 244A - statutory alternate remedy - the Petitioner must only avail the remedy as provided for by the statute. The fact that we have a wide jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution does not mean that we can disregard the substantive provisions of the statute and the mechanism provided thereunder. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 07:36:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Denies Direct Refund Claim; Petitioner Must Use Statutory Remedy Under Income Tax Act Section 244A.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56501</link>
      <description>Refunds claim along with interest accrued thereon u/s 244A - statutory alternate remedy - the Petitioner must only avail the remedy as provided for by the statute. The fact that we have a wide jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution does not mean that we can disregard the substantive provisions of the statute and the mechanism provided thereunder. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 07:36:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>