<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403489</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the issue of disallowance under Section 14A to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The issue of notional interest disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) was not pressed as relief was already granted. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of carbon credit receipts, holding them as capital receipts and not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1081 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403489</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the issue of disallowance under Section 14A to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The issue of notional interest disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) was not pressed as relief was already granted. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of carbon credit receipts, holding them as capital receipts and not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>