<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1070 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403478</link>
    <description>Share capital and share premium received from identified group companies were treated as explained where the assessee produced share application records, allotment details, confirmations, bank statements, audited financials, income-tax returns, PAN and incorporation documents, and the subscribers responded to notices and disclosed the source of funds. On those facts, the assessee discharged the burden under section 68 by establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, and the Assessing Officer supplied no adverse material to show that the funds did not belong to the subscribers. The commentary also notes that, where the same share capital is assessed in the hands of the subscriber companies, addition in the recipient&#039;s hands would amount to double addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 07:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1070 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403478</link>
      <description>Share capital and share premium received from identified group companies were treated as explained where the assessee produced share application records, allotment details, confirmations, bank statements, audited financials, income-tax returns, PAN and incorporation documents, and the subscribers responded to notices and disclosed the source of funds. On those facts, the assessee discharged the burden under section 68 by establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, and the Assessing Officer supplied no adverse material to show that the funds did not belong to the subscribers. The commentary also notes that, where the same share capital is assessed in the hands of the subscriber companies, addition in the recipient&#039;s hands would amount to double addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>