<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1063 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving alleged bogus purchases. The addition to income was modified to 12.5% of the total amount, aligning with legal precedents and principles of justice. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions, leading to an estimation-based profit determination. The decision aimed to add only the profit element of such transactions, reducing the addition from the initial 25% to 12.5%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 07:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1063 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving alleged bogus purchases. The addition to income was modified to 12.5% of the total amount, aligning with legal precedents and principles of justice. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the transactions, leading to an estimation-based profit determination. The decision aimed to add only the profit element of such transactions, reducing the addition from the initial 25% to 12.5%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>