<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1060 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the impugned order did not withstand legal scrutiny. They emphasized that declared prices in related party transactions should not be questioned without evidence of price influence or flow back. The Tribunal stressed the importance of adhering to Customs Valuation Rules and requiring doubts about declared prices to be substantiated with adequate evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1060 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the impugned order did not withstand legal scrutiny. They emphasized that declared prices in related party transactions should not be questioned without evidence of price influence or flow back. The Tribunal stressed the importance of adhering to Customs Valuation Rules and requiring doubts about declared prices to be substantiated with adequate evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>