<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403464</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of dealers&#039; entitlement to &#039;C&#039; Forms for purchasing High Speed Diesel from suppliers in other states to avail concessional tax benefits under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The court directed Assessing Authorities to apply the rationale of a previous decision to pending assessments until the State&#039;s challenge was resolved. Additionally, the court upheld the availability of concessional rates for inter-state sales of High Speed Diesel, dismissing the State&#039;s challenge and emphasizing the rights of purchasing dealers post-amendment in 2017, stating any restriction would violate constitutional provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 06:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403464</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of dealers&#039; entitlement to &#039;C&#039; Forms for purchasing High Speed Diesel from suppliers in other states to avail concessional tax benefits under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The court directed Assessing Authorities to apply the rationale of a previous decision to pending assessments until the State&#039;s challenge was resolved. Additionally, the court upheld the availability of concessional rates for inter-state sales of High Speed Diesel, dismissing the State&#039;s challenge and emphasizing the rights of purchasing dealers post-amendment in 2017, stating any restriction would violate constitutional provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>