<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1054 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403462</link>
    <description>The NDPS Act does not permit re-sampling or re-testing of seized contraband as a routine measure. A second sample may be drawn only in exceptional circumstances supported by cogent reasons, such as loss, damage, tampering, or other compelling necessity. Mere dissatisfaction with an earlier laboratory report is insufficient to justify fresh sampling from the bulk contraband. On that basis, the order allowing a second sample was held unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1054 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403462</link>
      <description>The NDPS Act does not permit re-sampling or re-testing of seized contraband as a routine measure. A second sample may be drawn only in exceptional circumstances supported by cogent reasons, such as loss, damage, tampering, or other compelling necessity. Mere dissatisfaction with an earlier laboratory report is insufficient to justify fresh sampling from the bulk contraband. On that basis, the order allowing a second sample was held unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>