<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision Powers u/s 263 Upheld: Incorrect Income Categorization by Assessing Officer Justifies Rectification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56496</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - in the fact situation of the case there was no bar in invoking the powers u/s 263 - The income of the assessee from staffing, which was not an income from export of computer software was also allowed by the Assessing Officer without any application of mind and without any enquiry. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:59:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:59:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision Powers u/s 263 Upheld: Incorrect Income Categorization by Assessing Officer Justifies Rectification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56496</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - in the fact situation of the case there was no bar in invoking the powers u/s 263 - The income of the assessee from staffing, which was not an income from export of computer software was also allowed by the Assessing Officer without any application of mind and without any enquiry. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:59:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>