<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1046 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403454</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the Tribunal regarding the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were quashed. The court found that the Assessing Officer failed to establish dissatisfaction with the correctness of the assessee&#039;s claim before disallowing the expenditure under Section 14A, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1046 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403454</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the Tribunal regarding the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were quashed. The court found that the Assessing Officer failed to establish dissatisfaction with the correctness of the assessee&#039;s claim before disallowing the expenditure under Section 14A, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>