<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1038 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s intention at the time of land purchase was not to engage in a trade venture but to construct a house for self-occupation, later changed due to circumstances. As a result, the Tribunal determined that the gains from the land sale should be treated as capital gains, granting the assessee entitlement to deductions under section 54/54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1038 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s intention at the time of land purchase was not to engage in a trade venture but to construct a house for self-occupation, later changed due to circumstances. As a result, the Tribunal determined that the gains from the land sale should be treated as capital gains, granting the assessee entitlement to deductions under section 54/54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>