<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1023 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to avail Cenvat Credit for the Service Tax paid on insuring public deposits with banks. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Larger Bench, emphasizing the significance of input services provided by DICGC to banks and the need for consistency in judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1023 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing them to avail Cenvat Credit for the Service Tax paid on insuring public deposits with banks. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Larger Bench, emphasizing the significance of input services provided by DICGC to banks and the need for consistency in judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>