<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1019 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of interest on borrowing for day-to-day business needs. It found that the advances in question were related to statutory dues, not capital advances for acquiring assets as assumed by the tax authorities. The Tribunal concluded that the decision to disallow interest based on these advances was unfounded, directing the tax authority to delete the addition and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1019 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of interest on borrowing for day-to-day business needs. It found that the advances in question were related to statutory dues, not capital advances for acquiring assets as assumed by the tax authorities. The Tribunal concluded that the decision to disallow interest based on these advances was unfounded, directing the tax authority to delete the addition and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>