<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1016 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment, dismissed the appeal on disallowance of bogus purchases for lacking merit, and partly allowed the appeal on disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The disallowance on bogus purchases was reduced to 6% of estimated GP due to lack of essential documents, and the interest disallowance issue was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further review based on business purpose evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1016 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment, dismissed the appeal on disallowance of bogus purchases for lacking merit, and partly allowed the appeal on disallowance of interest under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The disallowance on bogus purchases was reduced to 6% of estimated GP due to lack of essential documents, and the interest disallowance issue was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further review based on business purpose evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>