<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293190</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, directing the exclusion of Accentia Technologies Ltd., Acropetal Technologies Ltd. (Seg), and ICRA Online Ltd. (Seg) from the list of comparables. The Tribunal also corrected the computation of ICRA&#039;s margin. Consequential and academic grounds of appeal were addressed, with certain grounds becoming academic and others deemed premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=634068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293190</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, directing the exclusion of Accentia Technologies Ltd., Acropetal Technologies Ltd. (Seg), and ICRA Online Ltd. (Seg) from the list of comparables. The Tribunal also corrected the computation of ICRA&#039;s margin. Consequential and academic grounds of appeal were addressed, with certain grounds becoming academic and others deemed premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>